Obligatory Stephanie Rawlings Blake Suggestion Post – Pt. 1

My EX-girlfriend Sheila Dixon (we had a falling out over a time share) will no longer mayor in just over a week. My NEW girlfriend, Stephanie Rawlings Blake (or SRB, as she signs her emails) will be transitioning into office, and the time for a new-but-not-really-but-maybe-it-will be era of Baltimore progress is waiting in the wings. Much like assholes and elbows, everyone has an opinion or two as to what our incoming lady mayor ought to do with regard to her personality, administration, choice of pet dog hairstyles and lip liner color. For instance, MMMMMMMcDermott gives SRB 9 pointers for mayoring, most of which she has probably broken already. Meanwhile, JMG uses his lvl 23 street lingo to put out some ideas on Westside development. There are others out there but I’m too lazy to look.

It wasn’t until Friday last week when former City Council member Keiffer Mitchell announced that he would be a part of SRB‘s economic development transition team (2000 xtreme associates esquire) that I fully decided to make my own list of ideas, pertaining particularly to economic and community development. I gave him the 140 character nuggets via Twitter, and here are the full text versions.

Stop developing the fucking waterfront

Not a day goes by that I don’t read some sort of master plan from the BDC, bulletin or article in the BBJ about some new mixed used retail slash luxury condo development being crammed on top of the condos that are on top of the dry dock out by Bay Cafe or HOTELS HOTELS HOTELS, and it needs to stop for a good long while. The waterfront surrounding the Inner Harbor doesn’t. need. any. more. developing. Furthermore the majority of these properties and development deals invariably involved shorting the city on the taxes it’s supposed to be paid, sweetheart deals on the land (Silo Point, Ritz Carlton, probably Westport, an attempt on West Covington) – and we all know how that turned out for our soon-to-be previous mayor.

With so much room for RE-development in a city that has far less of a need for NEW development, the point here is that the incentives – or in Baltimore’s case, ethically thin perks for developing in Baltimore – don’t belong in the areas where new development is occurring, they belong in areas where redevelopment is a top priority. Not that I’m condoning ethically thin practices and the old vanguard just can’t help itself but get its sweet, sweet cut of the profits but STOP RIPPING OFF THE CITIZENS OF BALTIMORE ON LAND DEALS. If the city’s government truly wants to make an effort in the way of rebuilding its tax base, they need to stop focusing on 3% of its land base. Which leads me to the next point…

Bring back the dollar housing program

This topic was broached by the diligent Slumlord Watch blog a while ago, but it’s an idea that I have been clamoring for for years now. The idea is simple: take wide swaths of abandoned row homes that the city is in possession of and hasn’t done a damn thing with, and sell them for a dollar. Or if it makes them feel better, $6,000 – it doesn’t matter. Put a residency requirement on the house (which currently doesn’t exist, resulting in squatting scumbag speculators leaving their blighty goodness all over the place) and give the owners a provisional 5 year discount – say 50% – on the property taxes. With 30,000 vacant properties, I’m pretty sure the city could offload a few of them in their possession to those of us that actually want to live in the city.

Now, I fully realize the city just can’t help itself and wants to do a bit of its own speculation with regard to certain areas and the boarded up shit holes in its possession but again, if the city’s government is truly interested in rebuilding the tax base and opening the window to lower property taxes for everyone, it is a hell of a lot better to get started NOW with those that are legitimately interested in living in the city and improving their surroundings than playing the speculation game (which is soooo 2005 btw).

Charter Schools, Charter Schools, Private Schools

This is an issue that is in a state of revival but it needs to be stated over and over – we need more charter and small private schools in this city if we’re ever going to maintain a meaningful, productive population.

Some years ago a lot of charter schools tried to set up shop in the city and were met with great resistance by the teacher’s unions, administration, the powers that be and so forth. The going conspiracy theories as to why this was the case were varied but involved the usual excuses – lack of funds, it makes the other public schools look bad (even worse), on and on. Fortunately this isn’t necessarily the case these days and charter schools are slowly starting to pop up around the city, with the hopes of small class sizes and unorthodox education methods bringing parents and students to their doors, desperate for an alternative to the rest of the otherwise shattered city public education system. And quite frankly, this is the most immediate need in the city right now. One could literally go on for pages and days on this point but the bottom line is pretty simple: if the city’s government is truly interested in preventing youth violence/death and preserving the middle class that has been fleeing the city for generations in an effort to raise a family in the suburbs we need competitive, small and otherwise productive schools that aren’t tied down by the hopelessly broken bureaucracy that encompasses the rest of the city’s public schools.

coming up in part 2 …gardens, green jobs and uh, some other g word.